Heim
 
Nettverk
 
Korpus/Database
 
Aktivitetar
Prosjekt (pl)
Stormøte 2010
Stormøte 2009
Stormøte 2008
Stormøte 2007
Stormøte 2006
Archive
Program
Workshop
Stormøte 2005
Oslo PhD Course
Arbeidsgrupper
 
NORMS
 
N'CLAV
 
Media
 
Bibliografi
 
Ressursar
 
Blogg
 
[ Logg inn ]
Printer friendly

Solf workshop (ScanDiaSyn 2006 Grand Meeting)

Icelandic V-to-I movement reconsidered

Anna-Lena Wiklund, Þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Kristine Bentzen, Universitetet i Tromsø

(Pdf-version here)

Icelandic is standardly assumed to have independent verb movement to the IP domain (V-to-I movement) in so-called non-V2 contexts, such as relative clauses and embedded whquestions. In this paper we present some new data which question the empirical part of the standard assumption. Angantýsson (2001) has shown that verb movement past adverbs and negation is in fact optional, rather than obligatory, in non-V2 contexts (from Angantýsson 2001):

(1)    Ég veit [hvaða mynd Jón {hefur} ekki {hefur} séð].

I know   which film   Jón   has     not    has    seen
‘I know which film Jón has not seen.’

The data suggest that verb movement in Icelandic interacts with the CP domain of the clause. In some varieties, verb movement is obligatory in the presence of , see (2). Taking this interaction seriously, we put forth the hypothesis that verb movement, when it occurs, always targets the CP domain of the clause, rather than the IP domain. The hypothesis is supported by the following empirical facts. (i) When the verb moves, it obligatorily crosses all adverbs, as well as negation. The verb can therefore not intervene between these, see (3). This indicates that there are no intermediate projections in the IP domain that are potential landing sites for the verb. (ii) The verb follows all adverbs in ECM infinitives, which are standardly assumed to lack a CP domain, see (4). This fact is unexpected on V-to-I analyses of verb movement in Icelandic but is captured on our hypothesis that the relevant verb movement always targets the CP domain of the clause.

(2)    Hann spurði hvort að hún {hafi} alltaf {*hafi} sungið í sturtunni.
he asked whether that she had always had sung in shower.the
‘He asked whether she always had sung in the shower.’

(3)    Hann spurði hvort hún {hafi} ekki {*hafi} sennilega {*hafi} oft {hafi} sungið
he asked whether  she  had   not     had    probably    had   often had sung
í sturtunni.
in shower.the
‘He asked whether she had not probably often sung in the shower.’

(4)    Hann taldi  hana {*syngja} alltaf {syngja} í sturtunni.
he believed her      sing    always  sing    in shower.the
‘He believed her to always be singing in the shower.’

We propose a remnant movement account of verb movement in Icelandic, where non-V2 contexts involve movement of a remnant vP containing the subject and the verb to the CP domain. The remnant vP targets either of two positions, Spec,FinP or Spec,TopP.

References
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2001. Skandinavísk orðaröð í íslenskum aukasetningum. Íslenskt mál 23: 95–122.


Det humanistiske fakultet, Universitetet i Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø TLF: 776 44240
Oppdatert av medarbeider Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson den 01.06.2006 14:29
Ansvarlig redaktør: fakultetsdirektør Jørgen Fossland


Read this page in: Bokmål