Heim
 
Nettverk
 
Korpus/Database
 
Aktivitetar
Prosjekt (pl)
Stormøte 2010
Stormøte 2009
Stormøte 2008
Stormøte 2007
Stormøte 2006
Stormøte 2005
Oslo PhD Course
Arbeidsgrupper
 
NORMS
 
N'CLAV
 
Media
 
Bibliografi
 
Ressursar
 
Blogg
 
[ Logg inn ]
Printer friendly

Abstract Leonie Cornips

Standardization of syntactic elicitation tasks, speakers of dialects and why acceptability judgments do not provide direct access to speakers' linguistic competence.

The aim of this course is to evaluate a number of factors why acceptability judgments from non-linguists do not provide direct access to speakers' linguistic competence. In the first part of the course, we will discuss major reasons why a native speaker may reject structures on other grounds than those are relevant to the researcher. We will for instance show that various acceptability tasks have 'unwanted' effects. Furthermore, the unreliability of native speaker intuitions will also be dealt with by notions such as prescriptive norms, implicit and explicit knowledge, relation between standard variety and dialects, the differences between oral and written elicitation, more of less difficult structures to elicit and which subject is a good subject. It is shown that elicitation data are useful for every syntactic analysis once the native speaker intuitions and tasks-effects are interpreted carefully.
In the second part of the course, we will discuss in more detail two case studies showing that (i) different elicitation tasks bring about different judgments and (2) native speakers of local dialects may accept more than one construction which is not predicted by formal theories revealing syntactic variation along geographical and/or social dimensions.


References

Bard, E.G., Robertson, D. and A. Sorace (1996). Magnitude estimation
   of linguistic acceptability. Language 72.1: 32-68.
Cornips, Leonie and Cecilia Poletto. to appear ‘On standardising
   syntactic elicitation techniques. In: Lingua,
Cowart, Wayne (1997). Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective
   Methods to Sentence Judgments
. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Gervain, Judith (2002). "Linguistic methodology and microvariation in
   language
". Unpublished MA thesis. University of Szeged.
Labov, William (1996). When intuitions fail. Papers from the 32nd
   Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society
, 32: 76-106.
Schütze, Carson T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics.    Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: The
   University of Chicago Press.


Det humanistiske fakultet, Universitetet i Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø TLF: 776 44240
Oppdatert av medarbeider Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson den 19.08.2004 20:44
Ansvarlig redaktør: fakultetsdirektør Jørgen Fossland


Read this page in: Bokmål