|
Import FS
Informasjon om pensum, seminarer, undervisning osv, finner du her.
STV-2052: FN Rollespill Omfang 10 studiepoeng | Emnetype Teoretisk. | Emnenivå/studieår Vanligvis tredje året. | Undervisningsspråk Engelsk | Eksamenssemester Vår
| Mål Dette er et valgfritt emne som kan inngå i en bachelorgrad i statsvitenskap, som et av de valgfrie emnene som kreves på 2000 nivå. Det kan også være et valgfag i bachelorprogrammene i helseadministrasjon og i andre samfunnsfag, og på jus, fiskeri og humanistiske fag.
| Innhold FN-rollespillet er et emne der nye og innovative undervisningsstrategier blir anvendt og som med økende popularitet er innført på skoler og universiteter verden over. Det er støtta av forskjellige internasjonale FN-samband og FN selv. FN-rollespillet gir studenter muligheten til å oppleve internasjonale forhandlinger og diplomati gjennom en nøyaktig simulering av prosessene som finner sted i FN, spesielt i Generalforsamlinga og/eller Sikkerhetsrådet.
Studenter fra andre fakultet er velkommen til å delta på emnet. Emnet er spesielt viktig for de som studerer internasjonal politikk eller fredsstudier. Studentene lærer og erfarer hvordan den mest innflytelsesrike institusjonen i forhold til internasjonal fred og sikkerhet fungerer, både som en effektiv og ineffektiv institusjon.
Det forventes at alle studenter som studerer internasjonale relasjoner eller fredsstudier vil ta emnet. FN-kurset gir studentene både praktisk og teoretisk innsikt i internasjonale relasjoner og forhandlinger av typen som utspiller seg i, eller i forbindelse med FNs Sikkerhetsråd. Studentene lærer om strukturen til både Folkeforbundet og Forente Nasjoner, fulgt av en mer inngående studie av Sikkerhetsrådet. Studentene vil bli kjent med hvilke typer problemstillinger som diskuteres i Sikkerhetsrådet så vel som prosedyrene i det eneste internasjonale organet som jobber med temaet fred og internasjonal sikkerhet. Teorier fra internasjonale relasjoner vil bli særlig diskutert ettersom de kan knyttes til FNs utforming og praksis. Hvert år velges det et tema eller FN-scenario som blir diskutert på forelesningene og i løpet av todagersmøtet. Alt i alt gir dette kurset studentene en unik læreopplevelse og muligheten til å forstå, og samtidig konstruktivt kritisere, en betydelig og kontroversiell internasjonal institusjon.
Studentutbytte: Studentene vil bli inndelt etter noen av eller alle landene som er representerte i Sikkerhetsrådet og må finne ut om sitt land sin posisjon i forhold til det valgte scenariet . Studentene kommer til å lære om ulike lands posisjoner i forhold til et internasjonalt spørsmål, om standard reglement og prosedyrer for Sikkerhetsrådet og om hvordan lage troverdige utkast til resolusjoner til møtet. Dette emnet bedrer effektivt studentenes ferdigheter innenfor: 1. Skriving 2. Muntlig framlegging 3. Problemløsning 4. Konfliktløsning 5. Lederskap 6. Lagutvikling/lagbygging. 7. Kildebruk og kunnskap 8. Forvaltning/bruk av tid.
Kunnskapen studentene tilegner seg gjennom dette emnet gjør dem godt forberedt til å kunne delta på konferanser andre steder i verden, de får utvida kunnskap om en viktig internasjonal institusjon og internasjonal erfaring.
| Undervisning Emnet inkluderer forelesninger og et todagers møte.
| Eksamen og vurdering Eksamen består av to komponenter. 1) En posisjonsutgreiing på 7-800 ord. Denne vurderes til bestått/ikke-bestått. 2) En akademisk utgreiing på 2500-3000 ord. Denne vil bli vurdert av både foreleser og en ekstern sensor og vil bli gitt karakter etter skalaen A-E (bestått), F (ikke-bestått). Det tilbys kontinueringseksamen ved karakteren F.
For å få karakter i emnet MÅ studenten få bestått på posisjonsutgreiinga og delta på møtet som er en integrert del av emnet.
Ad. 1) Før rollespillet må studentene gjøre rede for posisjonen til landet de representerer på møtet. Studentene kan begynne arbeidet med denne oppgaven så snart landene er fordelt (vanligvis første eller andre forelesning).
Ad. 2) Studentene må skrive en hjemmeeksamen for å avslutte emnet. Eksamen består av et tildelt spørsmål som studentene får utlevert på første forelesning, og som de har muligheten til å arbeide med i løpet av kurset. Det blir ikke gitt utsettelser på innleveringsfristen.
I tillegg til eksamenskomponentene på emnet er det obligatorisk å forberede og delta på FN-rollespillet/møtet. Studenter som ikke deltar på det obligatoriske møtet vil ikke få karakter i emnet.
Alt arbeid løpet av emnet, forberedelse og deltakelse på møtet, samt eksaminering, vil skje på engelsk. Innleveringer kan være på norsk eller engelsk. Studentene leverer oppgavene individuelt, men utvikler tema, strategier og forberedelse i samarbeidsgrupper/delegasjoner.
Emnet er utforma slik at studenter som er meldt opp i det må følge opp forpliktelsene sine til å delta (ettersom alle får ansvar for å representere et land i gjengivelsen av Sikkerhetsrådet).
| Kontaktperson Cathrin Carlyle/Carina Haug | Pensum Se hjemmeside. | Emnet overlapper disse emnene STV-3052 -1 10 sp STATSV-211 -1 9 sp | Hjemmeside http://uit.no/statsvitenskap/1993/12
| Timeplaner http://timeplan.uit.no/emne.php?year=2007&department=ALLE&module=STV-2052-1 |
Undervisning våren 2007 Forelesningene gis samtidig med STV-3052. Orienteringsmøte: 11. januar 2007 kl. 14:15, rom C-1007.
Ansvarlig fagperson: F.aman. Gunhild Elisabeth Hoogensen | | Forelesning | Første gang: 18. januar 2007 kl. 14:15, undervisningsrom UB
Foreleser Holger Pötzsch
| | Eksamen | Eksamen: Hjemmeeksamen Utlevering av 1. oppgave: Torsdag 15. mars kl. 09.30 i ekspedisjonen på SV-fak. Innlevering av 1. oppgave: Torsdag 22. mars innen kl. 14.00 i ekspedisjonen på SV-fak. Utlevering av 2. oppgave: Torsdag 12. april kl. 09.30 i ekspedisjonen på SV-fak. Innlevering av 2. oppgave: Mandag 30. april innen kl. 14.00 i ekspedisjonen på SV-fak Datoene kan bli endret. Varighet: 1 semester |
Utfyllende informasjon
Over er den formelle informasjon om emnet STV-2052, i tillegg har alle emnene hos oss egne sider hvor du kan finne utfyllende informasjon om undervisning, seminarundervisning, pensum, artikler, lenker og annet. En oversikt over disse sidene finnes under punktet undervisning.
MUN Conference: Arkhangelsk, March 26 – 30.
Papers due:
March 22 (position paper: 700-800 words; pass/fail)
March 22 (strategy paper: 500 words; MA only; pass/fail)
April 30 (Home Exam: 2500-3000 words (BA)/4000-4500 words (MA); A-F)
Course Responsible: Gunhild Hoogensen
Lecturer: Holger Pötzsch
Course language: English
Lecture 1: Introduction to MUN and UN (18.01.07)
This lecture provides an outline of course structure, schedule, requirements and content. Then, we direct our attention towards the historical origins of the UN system and possible understandings of it in the light of different theoretical schools within International Relations.
Readings: Claude (1971)
Keohane (1988) (MA only)
Lecture 2: Structure and principal organs of the UN (25.01.07)
This lecture focuses on the charter and the principal organs of the United Nations. We look at the functions and powers, the voting procedures, memberships, as well as practices. Special attention will be given to the Security Council.
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 16 and 17
Gareis/Varwick (2005): ch. 1
UN Charter
Lecture 3: The UN between theory and practice (01.02.07)
At this point, we focus on how the activities of the UN can be conceptualized. Is it a global or an international organization? What are the implicit understandings of ‘security’ underlying the activities of different UN organs? Is the UN a global actor on its own behalf, or is it a framework, an instrument to facilitate the activities of other international actors like states? How do states conduct foreign policy at the UN? This lecture directs special attention to the Security Council.
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 2, 23 and 25
Miller (1999)
Risse-Kappen (1991)
Hoogensen/Stuvøy (2006) (MA only)
Lecture 4: The UN and the maintenance of international peace and security (08.02.07)
Peace-keeping, monitoring missions, sanctions, humanitarian interventions – the UN is a world actor with global reach in pursue of peace and stability. This lecture provides a historical outline of past and present UN missions. How are these activities decided upon? What are the implications of interventions for state sovereignty?
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 3, 11 and 34
Goulding (1993)
ICISS (2001)
Rubinstein (2005) (MA only)
Lecture 5: The UN and Human Rights (15.02.07)
How are human rights anchored within the UN system? How does the UN attempt to protect individuals against deadly threats? Do attempts to uphold human rights from a global institution challenge state sovereignty?
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 4 and 19
Hicks (2005)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Steiner (2003) (MA only)
Lecture 6: Gender, Race and Nation (22.02.07)
Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) demands gender concerns to be integrated an all UN activity. The establishment of a Permanent Forum for Indigenous Peoples at the UN is a sign for the growing weight of indigenous populations in global politics. How do gender and indigenous groups’ perspectives influence contemporary UN activities?
Readings: Tickner (2004)
Res. 1325 (2000) and Pres.St. (2006/42) on Women, Peace and Security
Whitworth (2004)
Stewart-Harawira (2005) (MA only)
Lecture 7: Scenario specific (15.03.07)
This lecture deals with the scenario on which the MUN-conference 2007 is based. We will also look at practical issues in connection to the upcoming first assignment (position paper/strategy paper).
Readings: Malone (2004) ch. 8 and 20
Hettne/Söderbaum (2006)
to be announced
Lecture 8 (Arkhangelsk): MUN practices (27.03.07)
The Rules of Procedure for the MUN conference are presented and explained. How are resolutions written? What procedures are necessary to get a draft resolution debated and adopted? During the practice of resolution writing we will examine ‘real’ UN Security Council resolutions.
Readings: Rules of Procedure (RoP) and Preparing for UiToMUN
Security Council Resolutions
Lecture 9 (Arkhangelsk): Final Conference Preparations (27.03.07)
As a final preparation we practice the rules of procedure on the basis of a mini training scenario.
MUN conference 2007 in Arkhangelsk
Two days conference on March 28 and 29 on the basis of the provided scenario.
Lecture 10: Concluding Discussion (12.04.07)
This concluding lecture takes up the question of UN reform (Security Council reform in particular). In the light of the experiences gathered during the conference we discuss problems and potential developments of the UN.
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 38 and 39
Malone (2005)
High-level Panel (2004)
Berdal (2004) (MA only)
Pensum
Course Book:
Malone, David O. (2004): The UN Security Council. From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London.
Compendium:
Claude, Inis L. (1971) : Swords into Plowshares. The Problems and Progress of International Organization. Random House, New York (ch.2: pp. 21-40, ch4: pp. 57-80).
Gareis, Sven Bernhard; Johannes Varwick (2005): The United Nations. An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, London (ch.1: pp. 1-40).
Steiner, Henry J. (2003): „International Protection of Human Rights“; in: Malcolm D. Evans: International Law. Oxford University Press (pp. 757-786).
Stewart-Harawira, Makere (2005): The New Imperial Order. Indigenous Responses to Globalization. Zed Books, London (pp. 94-97 and 118-139).
Whitworth, Sandra (2004): Men, Militarism and UN Peacekeeping. A Gendered Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London (ch.5: pp. 119-149).
Readings available online:
Berdal, Mats (2004): “The UN after Iraq”; in: Survival, Vol. 46(3), pp.83-102. http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/media/ha03eap98lcuugca5j6u/contributions/x/8/6/5/x8652wq6920526nw.pdf
Goulding, Marrack (1993): “The Evolution of United Nations Peacekeeping”; in: International Affairs, Vol. 69(3), pp.451-464. http://www.jstor.org/view/00205850/di012498/01p0777w/0?frame=noframe&userID=81f25cac@uit.no/01cc99331400501b4f4f3&dpi=3&config=jstor
Hettne, Björn and Fredrik Söderbaum (2006): ”The UN and Regional Organizations in Global Security: Competing or Complementary Logics?”; in: Global Governance, Vol. 12(3), pp.227-232. http://www.atypon-link.com/LRP/doi/pdf/10.5555/ggov.2006.12.3.227
Hicks, Peggy (2005): “Correct Diagnosis, Wrong Prescription: The Human Rights Component of Security.” ; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3), pp. 378-380. http://www.swetswise.com/swetsfo/swproxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsdi.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Freprint%2F36%2F3%2F378.pdf&ts=1167731462629&cs=833901236
Hoogensen, Gunhild & Kirtsti Stuvøy (2006): “Gender, Resistance and Human Security”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 37(2), pp.207-228. http://www.swetswise.com/swetsfo/swproxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsdi.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Freprint%2F37%2F2%2F207.pdf&ts=1167731642981&cs=2690779909
ICISS (2001): The Responsibility to Protect. Report to the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, pp.11-18. http://www.iciss.ca/pdf/Commission-Report.pdf
Keohane, Robert O. (1988): “International Institutions. Two Approaches.”; in: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32(4), pp.379-396. http://www.jstor.org/view/00208833/di012075/01p0250k/0?frame=noframe&userID=81f25cac@uit.no/01cc99331400501b4f4d5&dpi=3&config=jstor
Malone, David (2005): “The High-Level Panel and the Security Council”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3), pp.370-372. http://www.swetswise.com/swetsfo/swproxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsdi.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Freprint%2F36%2F3%2F370.pdf&ts=1167731531076&cs=3735657189
Miller, Lynn H. (1999): ”The Idea and Reality of Collective Security”; in: Global Governance, Vol. 5(3), pp.303-332. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=4&did=45076092&SrchMode=3&sid=1&Fmt=6&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1167732227&clientId=21127&aid=1
Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1991): „Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies.“; in: World Politics, Vol. 43(4), pp.479-512. http://www.jstor.org/view/00438871/di971264/97p0088b/0?frame=noframe&userID=81f25cac@uit.no/01cc99331400501b4f4d5&dpi=3&config=jstor
Rubin, Barnet R. (2005): ”The UN and the Prevention of Armed Conflict”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3), pp. 381-383. http://www.swetswise.com/swetsfo/swproxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsdi.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Freprint%2F36%2F3%2F381.pdf&ts=1167731564777&cs=4279427995
Rubinstein, Robert A. (2005): “Intervention and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Peace Operations”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(4), pp. 527-544. http://www.swetswise.com/swetsfo/swproxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsdi.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Freprint%2F36%2F4%2F527.pdf&ts=1167731603617&cs=4208696526
Tickner, Ann J. (2004): “The Growth and Future of Feminist Theories in International Relations”; in: Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. X(2), pp.47-56.
Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change (2004), pp. 59-74 and 75-93. http://www.un.org/secureworld/
Charter of the United Nations http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/index.html
Universal Declaration of Human Rights http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Statement of the President of the Security Council on Women, Peace and Security (2006/42) http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/588/65/PDF/N0658865.pdf?OpenElement
Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/720/18/PDF/N0072018.pdf?OpenElement
Undervisningsmateriell (Forelesningsnotater, transparenter, materiell, tidligere eksamener etc.)
| Model UN country assignments |
In the MUN-course a number of non-permanent member countries often have more delegates than others to encourage the necessary research needed for these countries. All country representatives need to be creative and skillful to strategically express their position and work toward their interests.
Members of the Security Council 2007:
TBA
Observer, invited by the Secretary General:
TBA
|
| MUN course schedule 2007 |
Welcome to the Model United Nations course!
LECTURES: Thursdays 14-16 in E0.105 (Social Science building).
UITØMUN VI: 28-29 March 2007 (in Arkhangelsk from 26. - 30. March 2007)
ESSAY DEADLINES:
Assignment I: March 22 (position paper: 700-800 words; pass/fail)
March 22 (strategy paper: 500 words; MA only; pass/fail)
Assignment II: 30 April 2007 (Home Exam: 2500-3000 words (BA)/4000-4500 words (MA); A-F)
Orientation meeting: 10.01.07
Course language: English
Lecture 1: Introduction to MUN and UN (18.01.07)
This lecture provides an outline of course structure, schedule, requirements and content. Then, we direct our attention towards the historical origins of the UN system and possible understandings of it in the light of different theoretical schools within International Relations.
Readings: Claude (1971)
Lecture 2: Structure and principal organs of the UN (25.01.07)
This lecture focuses on the charter and the principal organs of the United Nations. We look at the functions and powers, the voting procedures, memberships, as well as practices. Special attention will be given to the Security Council.
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 16 and 17
Gareis/Varwick (2005): ch. 1
UN Charter
Lecture 3: The UN between theory and practice (01.02.07)
At this point, we focus on how the activities of the UN can be conceptualized. Is it a global or an international organization? What are the implicit understandings of ‘security’ underlying the activities of different UN organs? Is the UN a global actor on its own behalf, or is it a framework, an instrument to facilitate the activities of other international actors like states? How do states conduct foreign policy at the UN? This lecture directs special attention to the Security Council.
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 24 and 25
Miller (1999) (MA only)
Hoogensen/Stuvøy (2006) (MA only)
Lecture 4: The UN and the maintenance of international peace and security (08.02.07)
Peace-keeping, monitoring missions, sanctions, humanitarian interventions – the UN is a world actor with global reach in pursue of peace and stability. This lecture provides a historical outline of past and present UN missions. How are these activities decided upon? What are the implications of interventions for state sovereignty?
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 2, 3 and 34
Goulding (1993)
Rubinstein (2005)
Berdal (2004) (MA only)
Glennon (2003) (MA only)
Lecture 5: The UN and Human Rights (15.02.07)
How are human rights anchored within the UN system? How does the UN attempt to protect individuals against deadly threats? Do attempts to uphold human rights from a global institution challenge state sovereignty?
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 4 and 19
Hicks (2005)
Steiner (2003) (MA only)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Lecture 6: Gender, Race and Nation (22.02.07)
Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) demands gender concerns to be integrated an all UN activity. The establishment of a Permanent Forum for Indigenous Peoples at the UN is a sign for the growing weight of indigenous populations in global politics. How do gender and indigenous groups’ perspectives influence contemporary UN activities?
Readings: Tickner (2004)
Res. 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security
Whitworth (2004)
Stewart-Harawira (2005) (MA only)
Lecture 7: Scenario specific (15.03.07)
This lecture deals with the scenario on which the MUN-conference 2007 is based. We will also look at practical issues in connection to the upcoming first assignment (position paper/strategy paper).
Readings: to be announced
Lecture 8 (Arkhangelsk): MUN practices (27.03.07)
The Rules of Procedure for the MUN conference are presented and explained. How are resolutions written? What procedures are necessary to get a draft resolution debated and adopted? During the practice of resolution writing we will examine ‘real’ UN Security Council resolutions.
Readings: Malone ch. 10 and 16
Rules of Procedure (RoP) and Preparing for UiToMUN
Lecture 9 (Arkhangelsk): Final Conference Preparations (27.03.07)
As a final preparation we practice the rules of procedure on the basis of a mini training scenario.
MUN conference 2007 in Arkhangelsk
Two days conference on March 28 and 29 on the basis of the provided scenario.
Lecture 10: Concluding Discussion (12.04.07)
This concluding lecture takes up the question of UN reform (Security Council reform in particular). In the light of the experiences gathered during the conference we discuss problems and potential developments of the UN.
Readings: Malone (2004): ch. 38 and 39
Malone (2005)
High-level Panel (2004)
Gareis/Varwick (2005): ch. 8 (MA only)
|
| Kontakt/Registrering |
Ved deltakelse på STV-2052 eller STV-3052 følg vanlig prosedyre for påmelding av fag ved Universitetet.
Du har muligheten til å registrere deg som kun deltaker på konferansen, dette gjøres ved å henvende deg til:
Andre spørsmål:
Gunhild Hoogensen
Instituttet for Statsvitenskap
Universitetet i Tromsø
9037 Tromsø
tlf. +47 77645593
faks. +47 77644905
mob. +47 97145942
epost. gunhildh@sv.uit.no |
| Programme UITØMUN March 28-29 2007
|
The programme for UITØMUN 2007 will be released in early March 2007. |
| MUN Linker |
De Forente Nasjoner/ The United Nations
FNs hjemmeside/UN website
UN foundation
Dag Hammarskjöld biblioteket (FN)/FNs dokumentasjonssenter/Dag Hammarskjöld library/UN documents
FN charteret/The UN charter
FNs nyhetsside/UN news
FN-databaser, inkluderer lyd- og bildefiler fra Hovedforsamlingen og Sikkerhetsrådet/UN data bases with sound and picture files of the General Assembly and Security Council
Sikkerhetsrådet/Security Council
Sikkerhetsrådets hjemmeside Security Council homepage
Resolusjoner/Resolutions
Sikkerhetsrådets presidentskap/Security Council presidency
Regler for prosedyre/Rules of procedure
Terrorisme/Terrorism
UN action against terrorismSaker på UN Agenda siden
Terrorism fact sheet
Lær om landet ditt/Represent your country
CIA factbook (objektive fakta)
list of countries at yahoo
CyberschoolbusPermanent mission to
/Forberedelser/Preparatory Material
FN-sambandet/Norwegian UN associationNORMUN (det nasjonale Model UN)WFUNA (verdenssammenslutningen av FN-samband)Det kanadiske FN-sambandet/Canadian UN associationOpplysninger om FN-rollespill (offisiell FN-side for MUN-forberedelser)Ressurser på nett
Andre informasjonskilder/Additional sources
World Wide Virtual Library - International Affairs ResourcesAmnesty InternationalDet Internasjonale Røde Kors/International Committee of the Red CrossLenker hos NORMUN
Aviser
Palestina/Palestine
FN, Sikkerhetsrådet, erklæringer om PalestinaOrdrette møterefererat om PalestinaFN - Palestinaspørsmålet gode bakgrunnsopplysninger
Støttedokumenter/Resolusjoner/Supporting documentation and resolutions
Resolusjoner i Sikkerhetsrådet
Irak og Nord-Korea/Iraq and North Korea
uavhengig organ som dekker FN (UN Wire)Det internasjonale atomenergibyrået (IAEA)Amnesty Internasjonal om IrakIrak-stiftelsenIrak aktivistnettverkUS Dept of State - Iraq updateGlobal Policy Forum Iraq CrisisCarnegie Endowment for International Peace Krise i IrakNoen irakiske linker
Andre FN rollespill/Other MUNs
Internasjonale FN-rollespillNORMUN
Det internasjonale europeiske FN-rollespilletKanadisk internasjonalt FN-rollespillCambridge universitets FN-rollespill
Glem ikke FN-sambandet i Fredrik Langesgate 13(rett over Pasta Basta/1001 natt)- masse opplysninger!!
Don't forget your local UN association located on Fredrik Langnesgate 13 (across from Pasta Basta/1001 natt) - tonnes of information!!! |
| Om Model UN |
FN-rollespill-programmets (MUN) popularitet stiger verden rundt. I 2001 deltok flere enn 200.000 studenter i FN-rollespill, ved å opprette slike konferanser i 32 forskjellige land.
Instituttet for statsvitenskap i Universitetet i Tromsø, i samarbeid med FN sambandet, arrangerer et FN-rollespill ved å opprette et eget 'sikkerhetsråd' hver vår.
Studentene spiller diplomater i Sikkerhetsrådets 15 forskjellige medlemsland. De presenterer perspektivene til de forskjellige landene, drøfter saker, lager foredrag, innstillinger til vedtak og så videre.
Dette er en flott måte å bli kjent med FN-institusjonens prosedyrer. Det er en artig opplevelse og man lærer hvordan konferansene fungerer i praksis. Deltagerne får et fint supplement til den teoretiske universitetsundervisningen på mange områder innenfor samfunnsfagene. Rollespillet gir kompetanse til å kunne få delta i andre FN-rollespill i Norge og i utlandet. Yrkesmessig kan deltagelse og bidrag til et FN-rollespill føres opp på deltagernes CV (curriculum vitae). |
| Pensum |
COURSE BOOK - available at Akademisk Kvarter:
Malone, David M. (2004): The UN Security Council. From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London.
Articles, book sections, etc:
Claude, Inis L. (1971) : Swords into Plowshares. The Problems and Progress of International Organization. Random House, New York (ch.2: pp. 21-40, ch4: pp. 57-80).
Gareis, Sven Bernhard; Johannes Varwick (2005): The United Nations. An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, London (ch.1: pp. 1-40 and ch.8: pp. 213-242).
Steiner, Henry J. (2003): „International Protection of Human Rights“; in: Malcolm D. Evans: International Law. Oxford University Press (pp. 757-786).
Stewart-Harawira, Makere (2005): The New Imperial Order. Indigenous Responses to Globalization. Zed Books, London (pp. 94-97 and 118-139).
Whitworth, Sandra (2004): Men, Militarism and UN Peacekeeping. A Gendered Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, London (ch.5: pp. 119-149).
Readings available online:
Berdal, Mats (2004): “The UN after Iraq”; in: Survival, Vol. 46(3), pp.83-102.
Glennon, Michael J. (2003): “Why the Security Council Failed”; in: Foreign Affairs, Vol. 82(3), pp.16-35.
Goulding, Marrack (1993): “The Evolution of United Nations Peacekeeping”; in: International Affairs, Vol. 69(3), pp.451-464.
Hicks, Peggy (2005): “Correct Diagnosis, Wrong Prescription: The Human Rights Component of Security.” ; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3), pp. 378-380.
Hoogensen, Gunhild & Kirtsti Stuvøy (2006): “Gender, Resistance and Human Security”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 37(2), pp.207-228.
Malone, David (2005): “The High-Level Panel and the Security Council”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3), pp.370-372.
Miller, Lynn H. (1999): ”The Idea and Reality of Collective Security”; in: Global Governance, Vol. 5(3), pp.303-332.
Rubin, Barnet R. (2005): ”The UN and the Prevention of Armed Conflict”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(3), pp. 381-383.
Rubinstein, Robert A. (2005): “Intervention and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Peace Operations”; in: Security Dialogue, Vol. 36(4), pp. 527-544.
Tickner, Ann J. (2004): “The Growth and Future of Feminist Theories in International Relations”; in: Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. X(2), pp.47-56.
Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change (2004), pp. 59-74 and 75-93.
Charter of the United Nations |
| MUN Resources |
Rules of Procedures
Rules of Procedures (RoP) are the formal guidelines that help structure the debate at MUN. Knowing the rules well, the representatives might be able to use the RoP as a tool for diplomatic maneouvering.
Preparing for UITØMUN
Here you find information on resolution writing, the formal recommendations of the Security Council.
|
| MUN Scenario 2007 |
The scenario for the international Arkhangelsk UITØMUN 2007
Here you will find notes from the lecture "Mun Scenario: Abkhazia" by Sigve R. Leland
Here you will find this years scenario
|
|
The following is a list of documents pertaining to Security Council Reform at the United Nations from the United Nations Dag Hammarskjöld Library. These files can be obtained at this website: UN Bibliographic Information System
R00689
OPEN-ENDED WORKING GROUP ON THE QUESTION OF EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION ON AND INCREASE IN THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE SECURITY COUNCIL. REPORT
NOTE: Established by A/RES/48/26 of 3 Dec. 1993. Documents issued under series symbol A/AC.247/-. All meetings were held in New York.
A/57/47 + Corr.1 (GAOR, 57th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/56/47 (GAOR, 56th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/55/47 (GAOR, 55th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/54/47 (GAOR, 54th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/53/47 (GAOR, 53rd sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/52/47 (GAOR, 52nd sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/51/47 + Corr.1 (GAOR, 51st sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/50/47/Rev.1 (GAOR, 50th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/49/47 (GAOR, 49th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
A/48/47 (GAOR, 48th sess., Suppl. No. 47)
|
| UITØMUN Security Council 2005
|
16.03.2005: Day one of Security Council meetings ends in stalemate.
The UITØMUN Security Council met yesterday in Audi-Max in a special session to discuss the UN operation in Congo, MONUC, in context of misconduct by UN soldiers and the special concern with women and security in this operation. The deliberations in the Security Council focused in particular on the issues of improving training programs for UN soldiers on matters of human and gender rights, as well as establishing peace and stability in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Members of the Council disagreed on how these issues should be approached. The United Republic of Tanzania stressed the importance of establishing stability in the DRC, while principles of human and gender rights in training programs for UN soldiers could be further established and developed in the future. The United Kingdom urged the Security Council to deal with these two issues separately, due to their different character. Considerable irritation with the inability of the Council to focus on the issue of gender rights was noted by Denmark, who encouraged the Council to take this opportunity to address this important issue. The Russian Federation wanted the question of natural resources to be targeted, as this is a prerequisite for peace in the area.
The Security Council yesterday discussed three draft resolutions. The debates were heated, and the representative of Argentina particularly urged the Council to adopt the resolution sponsored by Argentina. However, the differences were vast. The Security Council voted down all three resolutions. Today the Council reconvenes. Preparations were made by the representatives of USA, UK and China in secret surroundings of Driv yesterday evening, with the hope of forwarding a viable solution for the upcoming day’s discussion.
17.03.2005: Day Two
10:00: The UITØMUN Security Council adopts resolution on the situation in the DR Congo. Resolution 1588(2005) was sponsored by the United States, and achieved the support of all veto powers.
UITØMUN Res. 1588(2005)
10:45: News Release from the United Nations News Agency reporting that a massacre of UN civil and military personnel has just taken place in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Over 25 personnel were attacked with various small arms including machetes by local militias. This attack has been associated with increasing incidences of rape and sexual abuse on the part of MONUC personnel. Those participating MONUC countries most affected by the massacre have been Algeria and Benin, as well as Denmark and the United Kingdom.
14:20: The UITØMUN Security Council adopts a resolution introduced by the United Kingdom in response to today's reports on violent attacks on UN personnel in the DR Congo. The UITØMUN Security Concil strongly condemns these attacks, and expresses its utmost concern with the security of UN civilian and military personnell in the DR Congo. The United States abstained from the voting on this resolution.
UITØMUN Res. 1589(2005)
15:20:The UITØMUN Security Council is demonstrating its capacity to address the serious situation in the DR Congo. UITØMUN Resolution 1590 was adopted with the consent of all veto powers.
UITØMUN Res. 1590(2005)
|
| UITØMUN 2006 |
14 March, 2006 - Day One of MUN:
Environmental damage in the Barents aggravates security disputes
 |
| Council members listen to the opening speech of Quatar |
The 15 member states of the UN Security Council convened in Audi-Max Tuesday morning, March 14, 2006, for an emergency session on the serious tension amounting in the Barents Sea that aggravates international security. The UN Secretary General has expressed deep concern about the deepening rifts between a number of the leading members of the Security Council and called upon the Security Council to find a solution as swiftly as possible, to avoid further escalation of the crisis.
 |
| The delegate from Ghane presents his view to the Council |
The Norwegian government has seen its rule enforcement in the Barents Sea undermined by US unilateralist action. The USA, acting on its own and without Norway’s consent, has sent three ships into the area to assert their claim for their own ships taken under arrest by the Russian Federation in the Northeast Passage. Ice melting, instigated by global warming, has made the realization of the Northeast Passage possible, and the Passage has emerged as a logistical hub providing a main transportation link between the economic centres in Europe and Asia. The Russian blockade demonstrates Russia’s disagreement with Norway taking arrest in five Russian fishing ships outside of Spitsbergen, on the basis of which Norway is challenging Russia’s access to resources and Russian jurisdiction in the Barents Sea. Disagreements over jurisdiction and access to resources in the sea has then escalated to a serious security crisis in international waters.
During the deliberations in the UN Security Council on Tuesday, it was revealed that the Russian Federation has blocked the Northeast Passage because of the environmental damage that the 13 vessels have caused. Large oil spills from rusty and dangerous vessels, including Japanese and Danish vessels, have been registered, and photographic evidence was provided of the damage caused to the vulnerable Arctic habitat. The Russian Federation has assumed full environmental and sustainable stewardship of the region, thereby demonstrating its important and vital role in the development of this new transport and resource corridor upon which more and more of the world’s nations will depend.
Some members of the Security Council, in particular France and Greece, disputed the accuracy of the information about the oil spills. The Secretary General reiterated that the information has been confirmed by the UN News Agency.
 |
| MUN conference 2006 |
It was established in the deliberations Tuesday that inspections of the vessels were necessary in order to take action against environmentally hazardous ships in international waters. A draft resolution was tabled by the People’s Republic of China, but the detailed wrangling on how to conduct the inspections prevented any agreement. A further draft resolution tabled by the Kingdom of Denmark also faded in incremental discussions.
The members of the Security Council were clearly surprised when they in the afternoon Tuesday received information that Russian inspectors had boarded a vessel registered in France, after having received an intelligence report that suggested the vessel might be carrying other materials than it was registered for. Russia is holding the ship and the crew, fearing that this material might be intended to reach a terrorist group, as well as could be used to construct nuclear weaponry. This information suggests the validity of Russia’s claims, despite the ongoing controversy over the Russian Federation’s claim to sovereignty over the Northwest Passage, challenged from the United States, among others, that considers the passage to be an international strait. The French delegation to the Security Council was seemingly outraged by the information, and disputed the accuracy of its content. The delegation of Qatar urged the French to act upon the serious security crisis in a balanced manner. The delegation of Ghana demanded that the members contribute their energies toward a sustainable solution, a message reiterated also by Slovakia and The Democratic Republic of Congo.
The Security Council discussions continue today. All delegations were observed in vivid debate in secret surroundings of Driv yesterday evening, with the hope of forwarding a viable solution for the upcoming day’s discussion.
 |
| Council members debating at Driv |
|
|
|
|